<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taxonomy: It sits in the critical path of …</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefuturevalueofbusiness.com/taxonomy-it-sits-in-the-critical-path-of-%e2%80%a6.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefuturevalueofbusiness.com/taxonomy-it-sits-in-the-critical-path-of-%e2%80%a6.htm</link>
	<description>Using Business Intelligence to make data meaningful and solve business problems.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:06:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott Felten</title>
		<link>http://thefuturevalueofbusiness.com/taxonomy-it-sits-in-the-critical-path-of-%e2%80%a6.htm/comment-page-1#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Felten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturevalueofbusiness.com/?p=148#comment-676</guid>
		<description>Prashant, 

Very good point! Taxonomy is to data profiling as good foot skills are to excellent football (soccer).  One begats the other - its the chicken and the egg of data quality. Which comes first - a decent taxonomy or the effort of data profiling. I suppose that if we start with the business folks in a weak data infrastructure environment, we would purly speak about taxonomy. Given a somewhat mature data infrastructure or starting from IT, we would most likely want to begin our discussions on the interim data profiling results.

Either way, nice catch Prashant! 

In your post &quot;Approach to Start the Data Profiling&quot; - I agree that if you are very familiar with the data and are equally talented in sql, then a db driven approach may be appealing. On the other hand, purchasing tools gives broader coverage of profiling ability. Like you are implying, you have to weigh the benefits of each to make the decision.

Take care,

~Scott Felten</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prashant, </p>
<p>Very good point! Taxonomy is to data profiling as good foot skills are to excellent football (soccer).  One begats the other &#8211; its the chicken and the egg of data quality. Which comes first &#8211; a decent taxonomy or the effort of data profiling. I suppose that if we start with the business folks in a weak data infrastructure environment, we would purly speak about taxonomy. Given a somewhat mature data infrastructure or starting from IT, we would most likely want to begin our discussions on the interim data profiling results.</p>
<p>Either way, nice catch Prashant! </p>
<p>In your post &#8220;Approach to Start the Data Profiling&#8221; &#8211; I agree that if you are very familiar with the data and are equally talented in sql, then a db driven approach may be appealing. On the other hand, purchasing tools gives broader coverage of profiling ability. Like you are implying, you have to weigh the benefits of each to make the decision.</p>
<p>Take care,</p>
<p>~Scott Felten</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prashant</title>
		<link>http://thefuturevalueofbusiness.com/taxonomy-it-sits-in-the-critical-path-of-%e2%80%a6.htm/comment-page-1#comment-675</link>
		<dc:creator>Prashant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturevalueofbusiness.com/?p=148#comment-675</guid>
		<description>You are correct. Taxonomy plays important role in the whole data management scenario. Especially when you take the data extracts out of the legacy systems, analyze it and then clenase it and then needs to classify, enrich your data. I worked on one of the classification thing earlier. 

I guess the missing part in the above list is Data profiling. Thats simple yet valuable step in any data management / standardization project. I have described its importance, approach and solutions in my blog - http://manageyourdata.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct. Taxonomy plays important role in the whole data management scenario. Especially when you take the data extracts out of the legacy systems, analyze it and then clenase it and then needs to classify, enrich your data. I worked on one of the classification thing earlier. </p>
<p>I guess the missing part in the above list is Data profiling. Thats simple yet valuable step in any data management / standardization project. I have described its importance, approach and solutions in my blog &#8211; <a href="http://manageyourdata.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://manageyourdata.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raveen Rajavarma</title>
		<link>http://thefuturevalueofbusiness.com/taxonomy-it-sits-in-the-critical-path-of-%e2%80%a6.htm/comment-page-1#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator>Raveen Rajavarma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 03:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturevalueofbusiness.com/?p=148#comment-544</guid>
		<description>Right on Scott!

Taxonomy is also very important when you think about Information Architecture for portals, collaboration sites, etc. Without a well defined and well thought out taxonomy, it would result in much chaos - a good taxonomy helps to mitigate potential chaos. I also allude to this in my post around Enterprise 2.0 and Governance (found at http://thefuturevalueofbusiness.com/enterprise-20-and-governance.htm).

Raveen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on Scott!</p>
<p>Taxonomy is also very important when you think about Information Architecture for portals, collaboration sites, etc. Without a well defined and well thought out taxonomy, it would result in much chaos &#8211; a good taxonomy helps to mitigate potential chaos. I also allude to this in my post around Enterprise 2.0 and Governance (found at <a href="http://thefuturevalueofbusiness.com/enterprise-20-and-governance.htm)" rel="nofollow">http://thefuturevalueofbusiness.com/enterprise-20-and-governance.htm)</a>.</p>
<p>Raveen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taxonomy: It sits in the critical path of … &#171; digital asset management weblog</title>
		<link>http://thefuturevalueofbusiness.com/taxonomy-it-sits-in-the-critical-path-of-%e2%80%a6.htm/comment-page-1#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>Taxonomy: It sits in the critical path of … &#171; digital asset management weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturevalueofbusiness.com/?p=148#comment-484</guid>
		<description>[...] Continues at The Future Value of Business [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Continues at The Future Value of Business [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.576 seconds -->
