Twitter Updates for 2010-03-20

March 20, 2010

Twitter Updates for 2010-03-19

March 19, 2010

Twitter Updates for 2010-03-18

March 18, 2010

Twitter Updates for 2010-03-17

March 17, 2010

Good enough?

March 16, 2010

When is good enough, well,  good enough?  I suppose that depends, one old argument says that close only works in horseshoes and hand grenades.  Can it work with decision making?  How about decision support systems?  Is good enough the manually created spreadsheets that over 90% of organizations use for decision support?  I would argue that while it’s not good enough, most business decision makers work that way. 

To get at the data that most executives feel they need to make accurate decisions, many turn to the manual modification of existing reports, or the creation of their own “Pet” spreadsheet they use almost daily, or certainly many times a week. 

 In an update to a report cited last spring on this site, a September, 2009 Dartmouth University study suggests that the error rates in formulas on spreadsheets in their study were only .087% of all formulas they audited.  HOWEVER, these were in cases where the formula produced the WRONG RESULT, and actually resulted in 87% OF THE SPREADSHEETS REVIEWED having errors in which the spreadsheet then produced the wrong result. 

How good is good enough?  What if you could reproduce the “Pet” spreadsheet in a true Business Intelligence solution which would ensure that the data and results in the sheet were as solid as the data in your transactional systems in the first place?  How much does the wrong data or the wrong decision cost you, or your company?  I would argue that “good enough” might just be good enough, if you could ensure that the data was accurate, and mitigated the possibility of error, while increasing the timeliness of the information to the decision maker.  We have deployed such systems in a couple weeks’ time leveraging tools like SharePoint, Excel, and other software products that our customers already owned, and quickly delivered a system to our customer where we dramatically increased the accuracy of their information.  These solutions form the basis of our iterative approach to Business Intelligence.

Twitter Updates for 2010-03-16

March 16, 2010

Twitter Updates for 2010-03-14

March 14, 2010

Twitter Updates for 2010-03-13

March 13, 2010

Twitter Updates for 2010-03-12

March 12, 2010

Facebook for Business

March 10, 2010

This morning I found the article “The Facebook Imperative Cannot Be Stopped” through @TechCrunch on Twitter.  In the article salesforce.com Cheif Marc Benioff discussed how the next evolution of software is to make every application like Facebook.  His observation is that tools like IBM’s Lotus Notes and Microsoft’s SharePoint miss the mark when it comes to true collaboration.  Tools like Notes and SharePoint allow you to collaborate on content by posting new versions or co-managing lists but have not allowed for true user collaboration and discussion.  Sure they have discussion threads that can be topic focused but they aren’t seemless or as easy-to-use as Facebook.

Think about the conversations on Facebook.  Your friend from out of town posts the question, “I need ideas for a 9 year old birthday party in the Cincy area”.  Within minutes, the suggestion start rolling in:

Everyone that is your “friend” can comment on the question.  Responses are real time.  If the friend had sent an email, it would bounce through the servers and firewalls.  Some would lose the mail message into their junk items, some would not respond, some would think to do it later (and then not do it).  With Facebook, the question shows up in my “Most Recent” list.  It’s there if I want to respond now or later.  Responding is easy.  All can see one another’s responses (unlike email where I may not be on a reply list).  You are engaged in the conversation because it is easy and allows for debate.

If Facebook were smart they would take some of the same concepts in their free version and create a Business Edition.  This edition would be installed within my firewall and rely on Active Directory for the users.  New employees would be set up as they would be in email.  The “friend” concept would be abolished as we are all colleagues that need to communicate with one another and all employees would be in my list.  I no longer need a separate IM client, as that feature is already built in.  Email is also built in…do I need corporate email?  (FB mail does not allow for attachments, only links…).  Additionally, my HR or event planners could post events and recieve RSVPs.  The calendaring isn’t great in FB – perhaps that’s an enhancement???  To me, having a conversation with my colleagues just became considerably easier.  Imagine the IT department:

Wow…wouldn’t that be great!!  What features would you add to the business edition of Facebook?

- Jodie

« Previous PageNext Page »